22 June 2010
The Semantic Puzzle | Stella Dextre Clarke & Alan Gilchrist about the “Future of Knowledge Organization on the Web”
Thought networking: Building the Semantic Web with consumer-directed semantic networking | Semantic Universe
“A super sophisticated mashup”: The semantic web’s promise and peril � Nieman Journalism Lab
Open Knowledge Foundation Blog � Blog Archive � Open Geoprocessing Standards and Open Geospatial Data
Outstanding ICT initiative award winner announced : JISC
Outstanding ICT initiative award winner announced : JISC: "In the end, the Open University (OU) entry was chosen for its virtual learning environment called OpenLearn which has widened access to education and transformed learning in developing countries."
Domain-specific Instantiations Based on the Open Semantic Framework � AI3:::Adaptive Information
RWTH Aachen, Bibliothek: Offene bibliographische Daten an der Hochschulbibliothek der RWTH Aachen
Seeing Standards
Seeing Standards: "The sheer number of metadata standards in the cultural heritage sector is overwhelming, and their inter-relationships further complicate the situation. This visual map of the metadata landscape is intended to assist planners with the selection and implementation of metadata standards.
Each of the 105 standards listed here is evaluated on its strength of application to defined categories in each of four axes: community, domain, function, and purpose. The strength of a standard in a given category is determined by a mixture of its adoption in that category, its design intent, and its overall appropriateness for use in that category.
The standards represented here are among those most heavily used or publicized in the cultural heritage community, though certainly not all standards that might be relevant are included. A small set of the metadata standards plotted on the main visualization also appear as highlights above the graphic. These represent the most commonly known or discussed standards for cultural heritage metadata.
Content: Jenn Riley
Design: Devin Becker
Work funded by the Indiana University Libraries White Professional Development Award"
Each of the 105 standards listed here is evaluated on its strength of application to defined categories in each of four axes: community, domain, function, and purpose. The strength of a standard in a given category is determined by a mixture of its adoption in that category, its design intent, and its overall appropriateness for use in that category.
The standards represented here are among those most heavily used or publicized in the cultural heritage community, though certainly not all standards that might be relevant are included. A small set of the metadata standards plotted on the main visualization also appear as highlights above the graphic. These represent the most commonly known or discussed standards for cultural heritage metadata.
Content: Jenn Riley
Design: Devin Becker
Work funded by the Indiana University Libraries White Professional Development Award"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)